I’m thinking of facilitating group experiments where 50-100 people all take the same supplement, follow the same protocol, get relevant biomarker testing before and after, and share results with each other. I’ll fund the first one myself, so no cost to participate (free supplement for 30-60 days, plus free diagnostics).
I’m thinking of facilitating group experiments where 50-100 people all take the same supplement, follow the same protocol, get relevant biomarker testing before and after, and share results with each other. I’ll fund the first one myself, so no cost to participate (free supplement for 30-60 days, plus free diagnostics).
I’m thinking of facilitating group experiments where 50-100 people all take the same supplement, follow the same protocol, get relevant biomarker testing before and after, and share results with each other. I’ll fund the first one myself, so no cost to participate (free supplement for 30-60 days, plus free diagnostics). What do you think? Would you be interested?
What would you want to test first?
Thanks!
If you want to make real money over time, I’d test something that would lower inflammation markers. Personally I’d love to see testing with TNFa. That said, RF and CRP may be cheaper to test(?). Some inflammation markers might be hard to standardize test group results by … at the very least you’d have to disallow taking other supplements that could lower inflammation. But, as inflammation drives disease there is need to know what we can do. Biologics do not work for everyone and they create risks. Yes, biologics are associated with auto-immune issues, but underlying can be TNFa and other markers. And there are lots of people who are suffering and motivated to buy the right thing.
Here’s a personal fav of mine. Cutoffs for iron for anemia are too low. Lives and their quality are being destroyed because even though research shows much higher iron levels are needed for men and women, many orgs and practitioners do not (or cannot with insurance?) provide the treatment needed.
Any supplement though … how do you get around ‘not providing medical service’ legally?
1 Like
This is what I’m doing with my nonprofit, but specifically for ME/CFS and Long COVID. Renegade-Research.org
Here’s a Science News article about us: How patient-led research could speed up medical innovation
1 Like
Good question about the “not providing medical service” - i’ve still yet to have a meaningful consultation with an attorney on the structuring of the project and relevant disclosures, but i’m sure in some form or another it’s doable - just need to find where the red lines are and not cross them. For now I’m gauging interest and seeing what people would be interested in testing, once I have confirmation that I’m not alone on this quest I’ll cross the Ts and dot the Is with legal. Any insight you have for me would be appreciated, thanks for the reply.