OSCAR --Outcome-based System for Consequence Analysis & Recommendations

How do you define this? I think that the system should be useful from most perspectives.

  • One could use it on their own data for any robust action outcome analysis.
  • it could augment the analysis case you mention
  • No proprietary data will be used for training
  • licence has yet to be determined.

I’ve got 4 of us (2 math PhDs, a statistician MS , and economist PhD ) involved in architectural decision making but there some practical challenges that will take some personal investment and lower level programming that will be bottlenecks but which I think can be overcome

2 Likes

My proposals are simple.

Only if you personally do it for yourself.

I warn you that I am not an expert in the field of big data, and the qualifications in the field of programming are very low at the Junior level.

  1. Refusal of big data and fashion methods in relation to yourself.

There are examples when a highly qualified specialist programmer spent 4 years of life on the analysis of a large array of data about himself
And he did not receive any useful information.
He publicly refused to continue the experiments.

Processing a large amount of data makes sense only for state structures and corporations with assets from several billion dollars.
Here they are strong.

Just think, you want to throw out a few years of life to get the result zero.
For entertainment, this is a good activity.

  1. Your tool can even be one text file and does not need Obsidian.md.

  2. In my opinion, your approach may work under certain conditions.
    The goal is a very narrow and specific achievement period for several months.
    The number of experiment participants from 250 people.
    For this short time, you can neglect the risks their probability will be small.
    You can calculate the standard for one specific purpose in a short period of time.
    This is a sample application of the method in intensive care. Here other risks do not take into account.

  3. The method of Fogg from the University of Standford deserves attention.
    Look, if not difficult.

Fogg Behavior Model

  1. In general, you need to study human biology.
    The secret of all methods is not in technology, but knowledge of human nature.

However, this is my vision and I have the right to make a mistake :slight_smile:

1 Like

bfme

Category of actions and the category of results.
About 12 years ago, I conducted a discussion with friends in a Livejournal on this subject.
These records are deleted.

We counted about 200 typical common patterns of behavior (patterns) in human life.
In practice, 20-30 templates are usually used.
These templates were entered into the database and sorted.
The database has been preserved.
It can be freely downloaded here

https://bio-management.jimdofree.com/тестирование-поведения/

The choice of goals.

People very often choose erroneous or false long -term goals.
The consequences are catastrophic for their life.
How you plan to assess your goals?

For such an assessment, you need to understand the trends in the development of the world and yours territria and predict the state of habitat for 25 years in advance.
Perhaps here your knowledge of big data will be useful.
The manual processing and comprehension of such a large array of data , requires many years of life.

See this topic and these materials.
They can give you food for thought.
I do not impose and I know that it is very low in demand and monetization.
For personal use only.
Those who understand this are already very rich and influential, and we fed with illusions, thought for a long time, studied for a long time and late for the holiday of life :slight_smile:
All decisions lay in a different area of activity, and we did even understand and lost our life.

Measurement of instincts through personal finances. Personal driving forces of behavior

1 Like